For many Kenyans, the mention of Malebo instantly evokes memories of church crusades, family gatherings, matatu playlists and a simpler era of gospel music. The song by veteran gospel musician Faustin Munishi has enjoyed an unexpected revival in recent months, finding a new audience among Gen Z and social media users who have turned it into a viral sensation.
But as the song trends across TikTok, YouTube and other platforms, a new conversation has emerged, one that speaks to the future of creativity itself.
Munishi has recently criticised the growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to recreate music and generate content based on existing songs. In a series of remarks directed at young creators, the gospel legend challenged them to invest their energy in creating original work rather than relying on technology to replicate what others have already built.
“Vijana acheni uvivu wa kubuni. Tungeni nyimbo zenu,” he said, meaning that he is urging young people to tap into their own creativity and write original music rather than relying on unoriginal ideas or copying others.
His comments come amid a growing trend where AI tools are being used to recreate songs, imitate artists’ voices, and generate music videos that can attract thousands, or even millions, of views online.
For parents who grew up listening to Munishi’s music, his concerns may resonate deeply. Behind every song lies a story of sacrifice, practice, inspiration, and years of dedication. When technology can reproduce a similar product in minutes, questions naturally arise about ownership, originality, and respect for creative labour.
Munishi also questioned the motives behind some of the AI-generated content appearing online.
“How can you make a video of someone’s song without permission and claim you are looking for Malebo and not the money from YouTube?” he asked.
His remarks highlight a concern shared by many artists worldwide: when content creators use another person’s work to gain views, followers, and advertising revenue, where should the line be drawn between appreciation and exploitation?
Yet the debate is not entirely one-sided.
Supporters of AI argue that the technology can help preserve classic music, introduce younger generations to forgotten artists, and provide new tools for creativity. In the case of Malebo, many young Kenyans discovered Munishi’s music for the first time because of viral online content.
Others, however, believe that technology should enhance creativity rather than replace it.
Munishi belongs firmly in that camp.
“The little knowledge you have on AI, use it to create your new song, then market it to make it trend on social media,” he advised.
His message raises an important question for families: What are we teaching our children about creativity?
In an era where a smartphone can generate images, write essays, compose songs, and edit videos in seconds, parents are increasingly challenged to help young people understand the value of original thought. AI can be a powerful tool, but creativity remains a uniquely human skill, one built through curiosity, discipline, imagination, and persistence.
Perhaps that is why Munishi’s words have struck a chord with so many Kenyans. Beyond the debate about copyright or technology, his message is ultimately about effort. It is a reminder that while technology may make creation easier, it should not replace the passion, hard work, and authenticity that give art its meaning.
As Malebo continues to trend across social media, it is clear that the song’s legacy extends beyond its melody. It has become the centre of a conversation between generations, between those who created music before the digital age and those growing up in a world where artificial intelligence is becoming part of everyday life.
The challenge for parents may not be choosing between AI and creativity. It may be teaching children how to use one without losing the other.
For more, click HERE to join our WhatsApp channel!
You must be logged in to post a comment Login